Netskopeは、2025年ガートナー、SASEプラットフォームのマジック・クアドラントで再びリーダーの1社として評価をいただきました。レポートを入手する

閉める
閉める
明日に向けたネットワーク
明日に向けたネットワーク
サポートするアプリケーションとユーザー向けに設計された、より高速で、より安全で、回復力のあるネットワークへの道を計画します。
Netskopeを体験しませんか?
Netskopeプラットフォームを実際に体験する
Netskope Oneのシングルクラウドプラットフォームを直接体験するチャンスです。自分のペースで進められるハンズオンラボにサインアップしたり、毎月のライブ製品デモに参加したり、Netskope Private Accessの無料試乗に参加したり、インストラクター主導のライブワークショップに参加したりできます。
SSEのリーダー。 現在、シングルベンダーSASEのリーダーです。
Netskope は、 SSE プラットフォームと SASE プラットフォームの両方で、ビジョンで最も優れたリーダーとして認められています
2X ガートナーマジック クアドラント SASE プラットフォームのリーダー
旅のために構築された 1 つの統合プラットフォーム
ダミーのためのジェネレーティブAIの保護
ダミーのためのジェネレーティブAIの保護
ジェネレーティブ AI の革新的な可能性と堅牢なデータ セキュリティ プラクティスのバランスを取る方法をご覧ください。
ダミーのための最新のデータ損失防止(DLP)eBook
最新の情報漏えい対策(DLP)for Dummies
クラウド配信型 DLP に移行するためのヒントとコツをご紹介します。
SASEダミーのための最新のSD-WAN ブック
SASEダミーのための最新のSD-WAN
遊ぶのをやめる ネットワークアーキテクチャに追いつく
リスクがどこにあるかを理解する
Advanced Analytics は、セキュリティ運用チームがデータ主導のインサイトを適用してより優れたポリシーを実装する方法を変革します。 Advanced Analyticsを使用すると、傾向を特定し、懸念事項に的を絞って、データを使用してアクションを実行できます。
Netskopeテクニカルサポート
Netskopeテクニカルサポート
クラウドセキュリティ、ネットワーキング、仮想化、コンテンツ配信、ソフトウェア開発など、多様なバックグラウンドを持つ全世界にいる有資格のサポートエンジニアが、タイムリーで質の高い技術支援を行っています。
Netskopeの動画
Netskopeトレーニング
Netskopeのトレーニングは、クラウドセキュリティのエキスパートになるためのステップアップに活用できます。Netskopeは、お客様のデジタルトランスフォーメーションの取り組みにおける安全確保、そしてクラウド、Web、プライベートアプリケーションを最大限に活用するためのお手伝いをいたします。

The Fab Five: Five Policies You Can Enforce if You Differentiate Between App Instances

Oct 20 2015
Tags
Cloud Best Practices
Cloud Security
Tools and Tips

A couple of weeks ago, my colleague Livius Feinbaum, one of our senior systems engineers in New York, wrote a blog entitled “Telling the Difference Makes a Difference With Cloud App Instances” (if you haven’t checked it out, do). In our marketing materials and conversations with prospects, we’ve started emphasizing the idea of differentiating between cloud app instances in cloud access security broker (CASB) tools, but not enough in my opinion. As a reminder, differentiating between cloud app instances means you (or more importantly, your cloud security tools) can tell whether an instance of an app is the corporate-sanctioned or someone’s personal instance.

 

As our customers embrace and, indeed, make cloud services a strategic advantage for their businesses, when it comes to governing and securing those services, they are maturing and realizing how important it is to differentiate between cloud app instances. The reason this is important is because I’ve heard other CASB vendors say “Sanction one app and block the rest at your perimeter.” That sounds beautifully simple if you don’t think about it. But if you DO think about it, the conclusion you’ll come to is that the corporate and personal versions of Box, Dropbox, Google Apps, Evernote, and so on – basically any app that has a personal and corporate version – are not created equal and not used equally. Why on earth would you want to set a one-size-fits-all policy (especially one that is a binary “allow” or “block,” which, by the way, is so yesteryear) on an app like that?

 

Rather than tell you how important I or Netskope customers think this is, the best way to convince you is through examples. Here are the fabulous five – five real-world examples sourced from our customers of meaningful policies they’ve been able to enforce when they can differentiate between app instances.

 

  1. Monitor corporate Box but don’t monitor personal instances
    Many organizations want to monitor activity and data within their corporate-sanctioned instance of an app while respecting the privacy of its individual users.
  2. Monitor corporate Dropbox and only audit activity in personal instances in the case of a suspected event
    Similar to the first policy, some organizations prefer not to monitor personal apps on an ongoing basis unless there’s a suspected event. One of our customers did this only when the organization suspected an employee stole proprietary content. Indeed the employee did, and through that review, the company was able to easily reconstruct the audit trail, prove wrongdoing, and even recover the stolen documents.
  3. Allow upload of sensitive corporate data to corporate Google Drive but not personal instances
    Many organizations like to get more granular in their policies and specify activity (e.g., “upload,” “download to mobile,” “share outside the company,” etc.) as well as data (e.g., DLP profile = “confidential – source code” or DLP fingerprint = “prospect mortgage application”), for corporate versus personal app instances.
  4. Allow sharing outside of the company from a personal instance of Evernote, but not the corporate instance
    Why would an organization care whether a user shares the Little League roster or a babysitter’s “to-do” list outside of the company? Increasingly, people work from home and “home from work.” Organizations that recognize this want to enable people to do the latter and not exert their sharing policies on those personal apps. Yet, they need to adhere to corporate policies for corporate data, and telling the difference makes them effective at doing both.
  5. eDiscover, classify, and secure content in corporate Box but not personal instances
    One of the biggest value propositions of CASB is the ability not just to detect sensitive data en route to or from the cloud, but also within cloud apps. Organizations want to find and secure their sensitive data in corporate-sanctioned apps but don’t not touch people’s personal ones. Differentiating between the two lets them do that.

 

Now you have five critical examples illustrating why it’s important to differentiate between corporate and personal apps.

 

Are there policies you set that rely on differentiating between instances that aren’t mentioned here? Please share them!

Netskopeとつながる

Subscribe to the Netskope Blog

Sign up to receive a roundup of the latest Netskope content delivered directly in your inbox every month.