Identify AI risks that remain below alert thresholds before they disrupt
business, security, or compliance policies.
Security teams cannot investigate alerts on every user, AI application, and MCP server with equal urgency. The agent identifies the entities most likely to impact the business and places them in a prioritized queue. Analysts can focus on emerging risks before they affect business operations, data security, or regulatory obligations.
Heavy AI usage can make productive work look suspicious. However, AI risk depends on behavior patterns, not activity volume alone. The agent evaluates activity against each entity’s normal baseline and identifies deviations that may indicate risk. Legitimate usage remains differentiated from activity patterns that require investigation.
Small data exposures can appear harmless in isolation, but create business risk as they accumulate. The agent identifies entities associated with these patterns, helping analysts address emerging cumulative exposure before it leads to intellectual property loss, data disclosure, or a compliance violation.
Repeated policy violations often appear as isolated events, making broader patterns difficult to identify. The agent correlates guardrail violations, unsafe prompts, harmful content requests, jailbreak attempts, and other policy breaches into a single investigation, helping analysts identify persistent risky behavior and understand the evidence behind the risk
MCP servers are assessed during approval, but usage can expand to new agents, identities, and tools long after that decision. Risk accumulates as these changes go unreviewed. The agent continuously evaluates MCP servers against actual activity, helping analysts identify emerging risks and verify that approved servers remain aligned with security expectations.
Security teams cannot investigate alerts on every user, AI application, and MCP server with equal urgency. The agent identifies the entities most likely to impact the business and places them in a prioritized queue. Analysts can focus on emerging risks before they affect business operations, data security, or regulatory obligations.
Heavy AI usage can make productive work look suspicious. However, AI risk depends on behavior patterns, not activity volume alone. The agent evaluates activity against each entity’s normal baseline and identifies deviations that may indicate risk. Legitimate usage remains differentiated from activity patterns that require investigation.
Small data exposures can appear harmless in isolation, but create business risk as they accumulate. The agent identifies entities associated with these patterns, helping analysts address emerging cumulative exposure before it leads to intellectual property loss, data disclosure, or a compliance violation.
Repeated policy violations often appear as isolated events, making broader patterns difficult to identify. The agent correlates guardrail violations, unsafe prompts, harmful content requests, jailbreak attempts, and other policy breaches into a single investigation, helping analysts identify persistent risky behavior and understand the evidence behind the risk
MCP servers are assessed during approval, but usage can expand to new agents, identities, and tools long after that decision. Risk accumulates as these changes go unreviewed. The agent continuously evaluates MCP servers against actual activity, helping analysts identify emerging risks and verify that approved servers remain aligned with security expectations.